In Re JZM
This text of 655 S.E.2d 832 (In Re JZM) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Matter of J.Z.M., R.O.M., R.D.M., and D.T.F., minor children.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Mecklenburg County Attorney's Office, by J. Edward Yeager, Jr. and Tyrone C. Wade, for petitioner-appellant Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services.
Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, by Sarah A. Motley, Charlotte, for appellant Guardian ad Litem.
Charlotte Gail Blake, Jefferson, for respondent-appellee mother.
*833 PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration of respondent's remaining assignments of error.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
655 S.E.2d 832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jzm-nc-2008.