in Re J.WB., a Child

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 19, 2012
Docket14-12-00342-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re J.WB., a Child (in Re J.WB., a Child) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re J.WB., a Child, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 19, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-12-00342-CV ____________

IN RE J.W.B., A CHILD, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 315th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011-07959J

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On April 11, 2012, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. In the petition, relator asks this court to order the respondent, the Honorable Angela Ellis, associate judge of the 315th District Court of Harris County, to vacate her temporary orders granting sole managing conservatorship of J.W.B. to the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services. Relator also requests a stay of the underlying trial proceedings. This court’s mandamus jurisdiction is governed by section 22.221 of the Texas Government Code. Section 22.221 expressly limits the mandamus jurisdiction of the courts of appeals to: (1) writs against a district court judge or county court judge in the court of appeals’ district, and (2) all writs necessary to enforce the court of appeals’ jurisdiction. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221. We do not have jurisdiction over an associate judge. In re Texas Dept. of Family and Protective Servs., 348 S.W.3d 492, 495 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2011, orig. proceeding); In re Reynolds, No. 14-11-00002-CV; 2011 WL 32208 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 4, 2011, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.).

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is ordered dismissed and relator’s request for stay is denied.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Jamison, and McCally.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Texas Department of Family & Protective Services
348 S.W.3d 492 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re J.WB., a Child, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jwb-a-child-texapp-2012.