In re Justino R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Justino R.

214 A.D.2d 448, 625 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4536

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 20, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 214 A.D.2d 448 (In re Justino R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Justino R., 214 A.D.2d 448, 625 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4536 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Gloria Sosa-Lintner, J.), entered May 17, 1994, adjudicating respondent a juvenile delinquent and conditionally discharging him for a 12-month period following a fact-finding determination, based upon respondent’s admission that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and July 24, 1994, placing respondent with the Division for Youth for a period of 12 months following a fact-finding determination, based upon his admission that he violated the terms of his conditional discharge by absconding from his group home, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

For the reasons stated in Matter of Deshone C. and Matter of Mark M. (207 AD2d 756, lv denied 85 NY2d 801), there is no merit to respondent’s contention that the juvenile delin[449]*449quency petition was jurisdictionally defective. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Rubin, Kupferman, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Gloria Sosa-Lintner, J.), entered May 17, 1994, adjudicating respondent a juvenile delinquent and conditionally discharging him for a 12-month period following a fact-finding determination, based upon respondent’s admission that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and July 24, 1994, placing respondent with the Division for Youth for a period of 12 months following a fact-finding determination, based upon his admission that he violated the terms of his conditional discharge by absconding from his group home, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

For the reasons stated in Matter of Deshone C. and Matter of Mark M. (207 AD2d 756, lv denied 85 NY2d 801), there is no merit to respondent’s contention that the juvenile delin[449]*449quency petition was jurisdictionally defective. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Rubin, Kupferman, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 A.D.2d 448, 625 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-justino-r-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack