in Re Justin Soliz
This text of in Re Justin Soliz (in Re Justin Soliz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed January 24, 2022.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-22-00033-CV
IN RE JUSTIN SOLIZ, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 310th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2020-17445
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On Friday, January 21, 2022, relator Justin Soliz filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Charles Collins, associate judge of the 310th District Court of Harris County, to vacate the trial court’s “order on petitioner’s motion to overrule objections and to compel discovery,” signed on January 19, 2022, which overruled relator’s assertion of a Fifth Amendment privilege to the real party in interest’s request for production #1- #5 and ordered relator to pay the real party in interest’s attorney’s fees.
Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Hassan, and Poissant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Justin Soliz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-justin-soliz-texapp-2022.