In re Justin R.
This text of 32 A.D.3d 365 (In re Justin R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary E. Bednar, J.), entered on or about September 22, 2005, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute reckless endangerment in the second degree, and imposed a conditional discharge for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court’s finding was based upon legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility.
[366]*366To the extent that appellant is challenging aspects of the presentment agency’s summation, those arguments are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. However, while not a ground for reversal, we believe that the presentment agency should have responded to appellant’s contentions regarding its summation. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 A.D.3d 365, 819 N.Y.S.2d 834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-justin-r-nyappdiv-2006.