in Re Justin Harold Szalla, Relator
This text of in Re Justin Harold Szalla, Relator (in Re Justin Harold Szalla, Relator) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-21-00272-CR
IN RE JUSTIN HAROLD SZALLA, RELATOR
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
November 3, 2021 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and DOSS, JJ.
Relator Justin Harold Szalla, proceeding pro se, seeks a writ of mandamus to
compel the District Clerk of Hansford County to transmit his application for a writ of
habeas corpus to the Court of Criminal Appeals pursuant to article 11.07 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure. We dismiss this proceeding for want of jurisdiction.
We have authority to issue writs of mandamus against a judge of a district or county
court in our district and all writs necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. TEX. GOV’T CODE
ANN. § 22.221(a), (b). Thus, for a district clerk to fall within our jurisdictional reach it must
be established that the issuance of a writ of mandamus is necessary to enforce our
jurisdiction. In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692-93 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding) (per curiam). Relator does not have an appeal pending in this Court
nor has he demonstrated that the exercise of our mandamus authority against the
Hansford County District Clerk is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. Consequently, we
have no authority to issue the requested writ of mandamus.
Relator’s petition is, therefore, dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Justin Harold Szalla, Relator, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-justin-harold-szalla-relator-texapp-2021.