In Re Justin Carl Pfeiffer v. the State of Texas

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: September 26, 2023
• Docket: 01-23-00608-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

Opinion issued September 26, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00608-CV ——————————— IN RE JUSTIN CARL PFEIFFER, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Justin Carl Pfeiffer filed a petition for writ of mandamus requesting

we order the trial court to (1) vacate its July 10, 2023 order denying Relator’s Third

Motion to Compel Responses to Relator’s First Set of Discovery Requests and its

July 31, 2023 order denying Relator’s Limited Reconsideration of the July 10, 2023

order; (2) overrule the objections of Real Parties in Interest David H. Berg and David

H. Berg & Associates PC, doing business as Berg & Androphy, and order them to

provide “unqualified and sufficient responses” to certain enumerated requests; and (3) allow Relator to conduct “reasonable additional follow-up discovery upon Real

Parties in Interest’s production of ordered discovery.”1

We deny the petition. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). All pending motions are denied

as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Rivas-Molloy, and Guerra.

1 The underlying case is Justin Carl Pfeiffer v. David H. Berg and David H. Berg & Associates PC, doing business as Berg & Androphy, Cause No. 2022-60439, pending in the 269th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Cory Sepolio presiding.