in Re Julius Stewart
This text of in Re Julius Stewart (in Re Julius Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-11-00472-CR
IN RE JULIUS STEWART
Original Proceeding
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The application (petition) for writ of mandamus is denied.1
REX D. DAVIS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Petition denied Opinion delivered and filed January 11, 2012 Do not publish [OT06]
1 The application has numerous procedural deficiencies. It lacks all of the requirements of Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.3 and, other than citation references to judicial recusal and disqualification, fails to inform the Court of the nature of the proceeding and the identity of the parties. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3. It lacks a record. See id. 52.3(k), 52.7(a). It lacks proof of service on the Respondent(s) and the Real-Party- in-Interest, and it is not signed by the relator. See id. 9.1, 9.5, 52.2. Because of our disposition and to expedite it, we will implement Rule 2 and suspend these rules. Id. 2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Julius Stewart, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-julius-stewart-texapp-2012.