In re Julius P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Julius P.

100 A.D.2d 741, 473 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17748

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 6, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 100 A.D.2d 741 (In re Julius P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Julius P., 100 A.D.2d 741, 473 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17748 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition granted. Memorandum: The record on this appeal overwhelmingly supports the petition seeking an adjudication that Julius P. is an [742]*742abandoned child and that parental rights be terminated. In a proceeding alleging abandonment there is no requirement that petitioner show “diligent efforts” to encourage and foster interests between separated parents and the child (Social Services Law, § 384-b, subd 5; Matter of Ulysses T., 87 AD2d 998). The voluntary placement instrument signed by respondent did not enlarge the statutory duty. (Appeal from order of Monroe County Family Court, Maas, J. — termination of parental rights.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition granted. Memorandum: The record on this appeal overwhelmingly supports the petition seeking an adjudication that Julius P. is an [742]*742abandoned child and that parental rights be terminated. In a proceeding alleging abandonment there is no requirement that petitioner show “diligent efforts” to encourage and foster interests between separated parents and the child (Social Services Law, § 384-b, subd 5; Matter of Ulysses T., 87 AD2d 998). The voluntary placement instrument signed by respondent did not enlarge the statutory duty. (Appeal from order of Monroe County Family Court, Maas, J. — termination of parental rights.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, O’Donnell and Schnepp, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 A.D.2d 741, 473 N.Y.S.2d 633, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-julius-p-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack