In re Julian S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Julian S.

266 A.D.2d 555, 698 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12216

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 29, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 266 A.D.2d 555 (In re Julian S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Julian S., 266 A.D.2d 555, 698 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12216 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Fitzmaurice, J.), dated June 16, 1998, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated May 1, 1998, made after a hearing, finding that he had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of robbery in the first degree and attempted robbery in the first degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him in the custody of the Office of Children and Family Services for 18 months.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Presentment Agency (see, Matter of David H., 69 NY2d 792), we find that it was legally sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of robbery in the first degree and attempted robbery in the first degree (see, Penal Law §§ 110.00, 160.15 [3]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., McGinity, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Fitzmaurice, J.), dated June 16, 1998, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated May 1, 1998, made after a hearing, finding that he had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of robbery in the first degree and attempted robbery in the first degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him in the custody of the Office of Children and Family Services for 18 months.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Presentment Agency (see, Matter of David H., 69 NY2d 792), we find that it was legally sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of robbery in the first degree and attempted robbery in the first degree (see, Penal Law §§ 110.00, 160.15 [3]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., McGinity, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 A.D.2d 555, 698 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-julian-s-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack