in Re Jules Dylan Stuer

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 13, 2020·No. 05-20-00177-CV·Published

Opinion

DENY and Opinion Filed February 13, 2020

S In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00177-CV

IN RE JULES DYLAN STUER, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 255th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-05507

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Osborne, and Reichek Opinion by Justice Reichek

Before the Court is relator’s February 10, 2020 petition for writ of mandamus. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition, and noting relator has failed to provide us with any mandamus record, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested.

Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

/Amanda L. Reichek/

AMANDA L. REICHEK

JUSTICE

200177F.P05

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Jules Dylan Stuer, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

in Re Jules Dylan Stuer (in Re Jules Dylan Stuer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)