in Re Jules Dylan Stuer
Opinion
DENY and Opinion Filed February 13, 2020
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00177-CV
IN RE JULES DYLAN STUER, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 255th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-05507
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Bridges, Osborne, and Reichek Opinion by Justice Reichek
Before the Court is relator’s February 10, 2020 petition for writ of mandamus. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After reviewing the petition, and noting relator has failed to provide us with any mandamus record, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested.
Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).
/Amanda L. Reichek/
AMANDA L. REICHEK
JUSTICE
200177F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Jules Dylan Stuer (in Re Jules Dylan Stuer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.