In re Jules Bouy & Co.

S.D. New York

In re Jules Bouy & Co.

244 F. 896

DecidedFebruary 15, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 244 F. 896 (In re Jules Bouy & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jules Bouy & Co., 244 F. 896 (S.D.N.Y. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, District Judge.

Charles E. Allen had a claim of $9,952.71 against the bankrupt, which he assigned to his wife more than four months prior to the filing of the petition in bankruptcy. He was indorser or maker of certain notes, aggregating $8,500, which were issued in the course of business transactions of Jules Bouy et Cie., a partnership, the assets and liabilities of which the bankrupt corporation took over. The trustee in bankruptcy was obliged to pay these notes to the holders, and now wishes to offset them against the above claim of $9,952.71.

[1] The referee held that this could not be done, and I think he was right. As between the bankrupt and Allen, he was an accommodation maker or indorser; Jules Bouy et Cie., the old partnership, being the party primarily liable. While Allen would be liable to the holder of the notes, he was not liable as between himself and that firm, or as between himself and the bankrupt corporation, who succeeded to their liabilities.

[2] The doctrine of subrogation is invoked, and it is urged that the trustee is subrogated to the rights of the holders of the note. The rule of subrogation,' however, cannot properly be invoked to render the accommodation maker or indorser liable to the person who was primarily obliged as between these parties to meet the obligation.

The right of offset, therefore, does not exist, and the referee’s report should be confirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, District Judge.

Charles E. Allen had a claim of $9,952.71 against the bankrupt, which he assigned to his wife more than four months prior to the filing of the petition in bankruptcy. He was indorser or maker of certain notes, aggregating $8,500, which were issued in the course of business transactions of Jules Bouy et Cie., a partnership, the assets and liabilities of which the bankrupt corporation took over. The trustee in bankruptcy was obliged to pay these notes to the holders, and now wishes to offset them against the above claim of $9,952.71.

[1] The referee held that this could not be done, and I think he was right. As between the bankrupt and Allen, he was an accommodation maker or indorser; Jules Bouy et Cie., the old partnership, being the party primarily liable. While Allen would be liable to the holder of the notes, he was not liable as between himself and that firm, or as between himself and the bankrupt corporation, who succeeded to their liabilities.

[2] The doctrine of subrogation is invoked, and it is urged that the trustee is subrogated to the rights of the holders of the note. The rule of subrogation,' however, cannot properly be invoked to render the accommodation maker or indorser liable to the person who was primarily obliged as between these parties to meet the obligation.

The right of offset, therefore, does not exist, and the referee’s report should be confirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 F. 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jules-bouy-co-nysd-1917.