In Re Judith Audrey Cook and Brandon Orcutt v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Judith Audrey Cook and Brandon Orcutt v. the State of Texas (In Re Judith Audrey Cook and Brandon Orcutt v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Majority and Dissenting Memorandum Opinions filed August 13, 2024.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-23-00718-CV
IN RE JUDITH AUDREY COOK AND BRANDON ORCUTT, Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 505th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 19-DCV-261182
MAJORITY MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relators Judith Audrey Cook and Brandon Orcutt filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this Court to compel the Honorable Kali Morgan, presiding judge of the 505th District Court of Fort Bend County, to vacate the trial court’s September 12, 2023 order on real party in interest Celia Gordy’s motion to disqualify relators’ attorney. Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Hassan (Christopher, C.J., dissenting).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Judith Audrey Cook and Brandon Orcutt v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-judith-audrey-cook-and-brandon-orcutt-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.