In re Judicial Ethics Op. 2018-1

Oklahoma Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel

In re Judicial Ethics Op. 2018-1

419 P.3d 390

Oklahoma Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel·Decided March 13, 2018·No. No. 2018-1·Published

Opinion

¶6 ANSWER TO QUESTION #_ 2: _No.

¶7 DISCUSSION-QUESTION_ # 2: There is nothing in the law that would prohibit the attorney from returning to the part-time municipal judge positions. However, the decision whether to offer the positions to the attorney would be made by each municipality

Honorable Edward C. Cunningham

Honorable Bill Hetherington

Honorable April Sellers White

Honorable Tom Landrith

Honorable Allen McCall

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶6 ANSWER TO QUESTION #_ 2: _No.

¶7 DISCUSSION-QUESTION_ # 2: There is nothing in the law that would prohibit the attorney from returning to the part-time municipal judge positions. However, the decision whether to offer the positions to the attorney would be made by each municipality

Honorable Edward C. Cunningham

Honorable Bill Hetherington

Honorable April Sellers White

Honorable Tom Landrith

Honorable Allen McCall

In re Judicial Ethics Op. 2018-1, 419 P.3d 390 (Okla. Super. Ct. 2018).

Pincite

419 P.3d 390 (In re Judicial Ethics Op. 2018-1) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.