In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against Hein
This text of 701 N.E.2d 1016 (In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against Hein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Pursuant to Rule II, Section 5(E)(1) of the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Judiciary of Ohio and section 2701.11 of the Ohio Revised Code, the Supreme Court appoints the following judges to serve on the five-judge commission to consider the report of the hearing panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline in In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against Jonathan P. Hein, Case No. 98-2388:
Pursuant to Gov. Jud. R. Ill, Section 2(B)(1), the Supreme Court designates Judge Hammond as chairman of the Commission.
Pursuant to R.C. 2701.11, Richard A. Dove, Associate Director of the Supreme Court of Ohio, for the purpose of this proceeding, is designated as Administrative Director to serve as Secretary to the Commission, with authority to sign entries and orders on behalf of and at the direction of the Commission or its chairman.
All pleadings and documents in this matter shall be filed with the Clerk of the Supreme Court. The original and seven copies of all documents shall be filed. Service on the Commission shall be made by serving the Secretary. The Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio shall apply to all proceedings before the Commission, except as otherwise ordered by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
701 N.E.2d 1016, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1404, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-judicial-campaign-complaint-against-hein-ohio-1998.