In re Judd
This text of 117 F. App'x 730 (In re Judd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON MOTION
ORDER
Keith Russell Judd (1) moves for three-judge review of a one-judge order pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 27(1), (2) moves for reconsideration of the court’s September 21, 2004 order denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and (3) submits documents requesting other various relief.
The court’s September 21, 2004 order stated that Judd’s mandamus petition would be dismissed if he did not pay the filing fee. Judd has failed to pay the $250 filing fee as required by the court’s previous order.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) Judd’s motion for three-judge review of the court’s September 21, 2004 order is granted.
(2) Judd’s motion for reconsideration is denied.
(3) Judd’s petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee.
(4) Unless Judd pays the $250 filing fee, all further submissions from Judd will be placed in the file without response.
(5) All pending motions are moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 F. App'x 730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-judd-cafc-2004.