In re Judas
This text of 74 A.D.2d 874 (In re Judas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a special proceeding pursuant to article 77 of the Mental Hygiene Law for the appointment of a conservator of the property of Edgard Judas, petitioner appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 4, 1979, as appointed Seth Rubinstein as coconservator. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. While it is usually the practice to designate a member of the family as conservator, in view of the factual circumstances revealed in the record, Special Term properly exercised its discretion in appointing a disinterested person. Damiani, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 A.D.2d 874, 426 N.Y.S.2d 39, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-judas-nyappdiv-1980.