In re Juanna T.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Juanna T.

279 A.D.2d 284, 718 N.Y.S.2d 819, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 110

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 9, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 279 A.D.2d 284 (In re Juanna T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Juanna T., 279 A.D.2d 284, 718 N.Y.S.2d 819, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 110 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about May 12, 1999, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that she committed an act, which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of assault in the second degree, and placed her on probation until May 2, 2000, her 18th birthday, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). Credibility issues were properly placed before the trier of fact and we find no reason to disturb its findings. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Andrias, Wallach, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about May 12, 1999, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that she committed an act, which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of assault in the second degree, and placed her on probation until May 2, 2000, her 18th birthday, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). Credibility issues were properly placed before the trier of fact and we find no reason to disturb its findings. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Andrias, Wallach, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 A.D.2d 284, 718 N.Y.S.2d 819, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-juanna-t-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack