in Re Juan Rivera Roman
This text of in Re Juan Rivera Roman (in Re Juan Rivera Roman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued February 25, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00085-CR NO. 01-14-00086-CR ——————————— IN RE JUAN RIVERA ROMAN, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On January 29, 2014, the relator, Juan Rivera Roman, filed two petitions for
writ of mandamus,1 seeking to compel the trial court to rule on relator’s motion
related to DNA testing.2
1 Relator also filed motions for leave to file his petitions for writ of mandamus. Relator’s motions for leave are dismissed. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure no longer require the relator to file a motion for leave to file an original proceeding. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52 & cmt. We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.3
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
2 The underlying cases are State v. Juan Rivera Roman, No. 320105, in the 209th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Michael T. McSpadden presiding and State v. Juan Rivera Roman, No. 1107807, in the 176th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Lisa Burkhalter presiding. 3 Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is procedurally defective. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5, 52.2, 52.3, 52.7. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Juan Rivera Roman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-juan-rivera-roman-texapp-2014.