In re Juan Q.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Juan Q.

260 A.D.2d 325, 689 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4399

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 29, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 260 A.D.2d 325 (In re Juan Q.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Juan Q., 260 A.D.2d 325, 689 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4399 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Leah Marks, J.), entered on or about April 24, 1997, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen [326]*326property in the fifth degree, and placing appellant on probation for a period of 2 years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Testimony at the fact-finding hearing, that appellant restrained the complainant while another individual took a “walkman” from the complainant’s pocket, established that appellant had the requisite intent to steal. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Andrias, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Leah Marks, J.), entered on or about April 24, 1997, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen [326]*326property in the fifth degree, and placing appellant on probation for a period of 2 years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Testimony at the fact-finding hearing, that appellant restrained the complainant while another individual took a “walkman” from the complainant’s pocket, established that appellant had the requisite intent to steal. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Andrias, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D.2d 325, 689 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-juan-q-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack