In re Juan O.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Juan O.

240 A.D.2d 749, 660 N.Y.S.2d 991

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 30, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 240 A.D.2d 749 (In re Juan O.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Juan O., 240 A.D.2d 749, 660 N.Y.S.2d 991 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Rockland County (Warren, J.), entered August 14, 1996, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated May 14, 1996, made upon the appellant’s admission, finding that he had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of criminal trespass in the third degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent, placed him on probation for one year, and ordered him to pay restitution in the aggregate sum of $2,250. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated May 14, 1996.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements (see, Matter of Joel M., 240 AD2d 747 [decided herewith]). Miller, J. P., Thompson, Joy and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Rockland County (Warren, J.), entered August 14, 1996, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated May 14, 1996, made upon the appellant’s admission, finding that he had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of criminal trespass in the third degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent, placed him on probation for one year, and ordered him to pay restitution in the aggregate sum of $2,250. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated May 14, 1996.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements (see, Matter of Joel M., 240 AD2d 747 [decided herewith]). Miller, J. P., Thompson, Joy and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D.2d 749, 660 N.Y.S.2d 991, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-juan-o-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack