in Re: Juan Guerra and Juan Deltoro
This text of in Re: Juan Guerra and Juan Deltoro (in Re: Juan Guerra and Juan Deltoro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENIED and Opinion Filed December 12, 2018
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01037-CV
IN RE JUAN GUERRA AND JUAN DELTORO, Relators
Original Proceeding from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-07967
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Myers, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Whitehill Before the Court is relators’ petition for writ of mandamus in which relators complain of the trial court’s order granting the amended motion to compel arbitration filed by the real parties in interest. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).
/Bill Whitehill/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
181037F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Juan Guerra and Juan Deltoro, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-juan-guerra-and-juan-deltoro-texapp-2018.