in Re Juan Francisco Jimenez and Rolando Quintana, Substitute Trustee
This text of in Re Juan Francisco Jimenez and Rolando Quintana, Substitute Trustee (in Re Juan Francisco Jimenez and Rolando Quintana, Substitute Trustee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-21-00199-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN RE JUAN FRANCISCO JIMENEZ AND ROLANDO QUINTANA, SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER
Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Tijerina Order Per Curiam
Relators Juan Francisco Jimenez and Rolando Quintana, Substitute Trustee, filed
a petition for writ of mandamus on June 24, 2021. Through this original proceeding,
relators seek to compel the trial court to (1) vacate a temporary restraining order and an
order setting aside a foreclosure on grounds that these orders are void, and (2) grant
relators’ motion to dismiss under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 91a because the
underlying lawsuit is baseless. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 91a (providing for the dismissal of “baseless causes of action”).
The Court requests that the real party in interest, Pedro Saldivar, or any others
whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the
petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this
order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed on the 25th day of June, 2021.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Juan Francisco Jimenez and Rolando Quintana, Substitute Trustee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-juan-francisco-jimenez-and-rolando-quintana-substitute-trustee-texapp-2021.