in Re Juan Francisco Jimenez and Rolando Quintana, Substitute Trustee
Opinion
NUMBER 13-21-00199-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN RE JUAN FRANCISCO JIMENEZ AND ROLANDO QUINTANA, SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER
Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Tijerina Order Per Curiam
Relators Juan Francisco Jimenez and Rolando Quintana, Substitute Trustee, filed a petition for writ of mandamus on June 24, 2021. Through this original proceeding, relators seek to compel the trial court to (1) vacate a temporary restraining order and an order setting aside a foreclosure on grounds that these orders are void, and (2) grant relators’ motion to dismiss under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 91a because the underlying lawsuit is baseless. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 91a (providing for the dismissal of
“baseless causes of action”).
The Court requests that the real party in interest, Pedro Saldivar, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed on the 25th day of June, 2021.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Juan Francisco Jimenez and Rolando Quintana, Substitute Trustee (in Re Juan Francisco Jimenez and Rolando Quintana, Substitute Trustee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.