In re: Juan Carlos Ocasio Roman

CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico
DecidedNovember 16, 2011
Docket11-01415
StatusUnknown

This text of In re: Juan Carlos Ocasio Roman (In re: Juan Carlos Ocasio Roman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re: Juan Carlos Ocasio Roman, (prb 2011).

Opinion

1 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO 2

3 IN RE: 4 JUAN CARLOS OCASIO ROMAN CASE NO. 11-01415 BKT 5 Chapter 13 6

8 9 XXX-XX-3794 10

12 FILED & ENTERED ON 11/16/2011

13 Debtor(s) 14

15 OPINION AND ORDER 16 17 This proceeding is before the Court upon Debtor’s Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Dkt No. 46)1 18 and the Chapter 13 Trustee’s (the “Trustee”) objection to confirmation of the debtors' chapter 13 plan 19 and objection to amended statement of current monthly income (the “Objection”) (Dkt No. 59). The 20 21 controversy is based on Debtor’s calculation of their current monthly income. Debtor, following the 22 format and instructions of Official Bankruptcy Form B22C (“Form B22C”), deducted business 23 expenses from its self-employed income, which resulted in below-median income, entitling debtors 24 25 to a three (3) year commitment period. For the reasons set forth below, this Court adopts the

mechanical test for determining disposable income as set forth in Sections 1325(b)(1)(B) and 1325(b)(2), by reference to current monthly income determined pursuant to Section 101(10A) and

1 Debtor again amended its Chapter 13 Plan on November 3, 2011 (Dkt No. 62), basing the same on the calculations of the ASCMI, thus, not affecting this Court’s current determination. 1 Official Form B22C, and therefore denies the Trustee’s Objection. 2 I. JURISDICTION 3 This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 4 5 §§1334 and 157(a) and the General Order of referral of Title 11 Proceedings to the United States 6 Bankruptcy Court for the District of Puerto Rico dated July 19, 1984 (Torruella, C.J.). This is a core 7 proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §157(b). 8 9 II. BACKGROUND 10 Debtor is a self-employed truck driver with a monthly gross income of $4,993.99. (Schedule 11 12 I, Dkt. No. 1). Debtor’s original statement of current monthly income (“SCMI”) or Form B22C 13 shows that Debtor’s gross receipts totaled $5,925.18, and after deducting $2,093.00 as ordinary and 14 necessary business expenses, Debtor was left with a net business income of $3,832.18. (SCMI, ¶ 3, 15 16 Dkt. No. 1). The applicable commitment period was five (5) years, with a monthly disposable 17 income of $599.311. (SCMI, ¶ 59, Dkt. No. 1). 18 On April 19, 2011, debtor filed an amended SCMI (“ASCMI”)(Dkt No. 13) in which gross 19 20 receipts were increased to $6,263.21, deductions of $4,754.68 as ordinary and necessary business 21 expenses, and a resulting net business income of $1,508.53. (ASCMI, ¶ 3, Dkt. No. 13). 22 Consequently, the applicable commitment is three (3) years. (SCMI, ¶ 59, Dkt. No. 1). 23 24 The Trustee’s position is that a self-employed Chapter 13 debtor, as in this case, should not 25 be allowed to deduct the ordinary and necessary business expenses from line 3 of the SCMI when

calculating the current monthly income and the applicable commitment period, even though the official form (Form B22C) so provides. 1 III. DISCUSSION 2 The Trustee contests deduction of ordinary and necessary business expenses when calculating 3 Debtor’s current monthly income in Part I of Official Form B22C vis a vis allowing said deductions 4 5 in “Other Expenses” category included in Part IV of Form B22 C. Form B22C comprises: (i) a 6 report of current monthly income (Part I of Form B22C), (ii) calculation of the plan’s applicable 7 commitment period (Part II of Form B22C) and (iii) computation of means test and deductions to 8 9 determine monthly disposable income for above-median income chapter 13 debtors (Parts III & IV of 10 Form B22C). We must first analyze the pertinent statutory language in Sections 101(10A) and 11 12 1325(b)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code. 11 U.S.C. §§ 101(10A) & 1325. 13 Section 1325(a) sets forth the requirements for Chapter 13 plan confirmation. 11 U.S.C. § 14 1325. Additional requirements for confirmation are triggered by an objection from a trustee or an 15 16 unsecured creditor, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(1). For instance, the Court is precluded from 17 confirming a plan over the objection of a trustee or holder of an allowed unsecured claim unless: 18 (A) the value of the property to be distributed under the plan on account of such 19 claim is not less than the amount of such [unsecured] claim; or 20 (B) the plan provides that all of the debtor’s projected disposable income to be received in the applicable commitment period beginning on the date that the first 21 payment is due under the plan will be applied to make payments to unsecured 22 creditors under the plan. Section 1325(b)(1) 23 24 Debtor in this case is not proposing to pay unsecured creditors’ claims in full, therefore, he 25 must commit all of his projected disposable income received during the applicable commitment

period to fund the plan. Section 1325(b) begins the disposable income calculation by determining the debtor’s current monthly income. Section 101(10A) defines “current monthly income” as the “average monthly 1 income from all sources that the debtor receives, without regard to whether such income is taxable 2 income, derived during the 6-month period before the petition date, subject to certain exclusions 3 specified in Section 101(10A)(A)(i) & (ii). 11 U.S.C. § 101(10A). 4 5 After obtaining its current monthly income, a debtor must then subtract a series of income 6 exclusions and expense deductions to arrive at “disposable income”. In re Williams, 394 B.R. 550, 7 557 (Bankr.D.Colo. Sep 12, 2008) citing 6 Keith M. Lundin, Chapter 13 Bankruptcy § 467.1 at 467- 8 9 3 to 467-12 (3d ed.2000 & Supp.2007–1) (describing the categories of exclusions and adjustments a 10 debtor must make to get from current monthly income to disposable income). 11 12 In this regard, Section 1325(b)(2) defines “disposable income” as the current monthly income 13 received by the debtor, less amounts reasonably necessary for support and maintenance of the debtor 14 and the debtor’s dependents. 11 U.S.C.1325(b)(2)(A). 15 16 Under Section 1325(b)(2)(B), debtors engaged in business are subject to additional 17 exclusions and deductions to arrive at the disposable income. That is, after the deduction of amounts 18 necessary for support and maintenance of the debtor and the debtor’s dependents, the debtor must 19 20 also deduct from the business gross income those expenditures which are necessary for the 21 continuation, preservation, and operation of the debtor’s business. 11 U.S.C. 1325(b)(2)(B); 8 22 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 1325.11[4][c] (16th ed.). 23 24 In this sense, the Court’s task is limited to determining whether expenditures are necessary 25 for the continuation, preservation, and operation of the business. 11 U.S.C. 1325(b)(2)(B); 8 Collier

on Bankruptcy, supra. Discretion must be given to the debtor, who will usually know its business far better than the Court or the Trustee. Id.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Nance
371 B.R. 358 (S.D. Illinois, 2007)
Drummond v. Wiegand (In Re Wiegand)
386 B.R. 238 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
In Re Williams
394 B.R. 550 (D. Colorado, 2008)
In Re Arnold
376 B.R. 652 (M.D. Tennessee, 2007)
In Re Tuss
360 B.R. 684 (D. Montana, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In re: Juan Carlos Ocasio Roman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-juan-carlos-ocasio-roman-prb-2011.