In re: Juan Carlos Ocasio Roman

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico·Decided November 16, 2011·No. 11-01415·Unknown

Opinion

THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

IN RE: JUAN CARLOS OCASIO ROMAN CASE NO. 11-01415 BKT Chapter 13

XXX-XX-3794

FILED & ENTERED ON 11/16/2011

Debtor(s)

OPINION AND ORDER This proceeding is before the Court upon Debtor’s Amended Chapter 13 Plan (Dkt No. 46)1 and the Chapter 13 Trustee’s (the “Trustee”) objection to confirmation of the debtors' chapter 13 plan and objection to amended statement of current monthly income (the “Objection”) (Dkt No. 59). The controversy is based on Debtor’s calculation of their current monthly income. Debtor, following the format and instructions of Official Bankruptcy Form B22C (“Form B22C”), deducted business expenses from its self-employed income, which resulted in below-median income, entitling debtors to a three (3) year commitment period. For the reasons set forth below, this Court adopts the

mechanical test for determining disposable income as set forth in Sections 1325(b)(1)(B) and 1325(b)(2), by reference to current monthly income determined pursuant to Section 101(10A) and

1 Debtor again amended its Chapter 13 Plan on November 3, 2011 (Dkt No. 62), basing the same on the calculations of the ASCMI, thus, not affecting this Court’s current determination. Official Form B22C, and therefore denies the Trustee’s Objection. I. JURISDICTION This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§1334 and 157(a) and the General Order of referral of Title 11 Proceedings to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Puerto Rico dated July 19, 1984 (Torruella, C.J.). This is a core proceeding in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §157(b). Debtor is a self-employed truck driver with a monthly gross income of $4,993.99. (Schedule I, Dkt. No. 1). Debtor’s original statement of current monthly income (“SCMI”) or Form B22C shows that Debtor’s gross receipts totaled $5,925.18, and after deducting $2,093.00 as ordinary and necessary business expenses, Debtor was left with a net business income of $3,832.18. (SCMI, ¶ 3, Dkt. No. 1). The applicable commitment period was five (5) years, with a monthly disposable income of $599.311. (SCMI, ¶ 59, Dkt. No. 1). On April 19, 2011, debtor filed an amended SCMI (“ASCMI”)(Dkt No. 13) in which gross receipts were increased to $6,263.21, deductions of $4,754.68 as ordinary and necessary business expenses, and a resulting net business income of $1,508.53. (ASCMI, ¶ 3, Dkt. No. 13). Consequently, the applicable commitment is three (3) years. (SCMI, ¶ 59, Dkt. No. 1). The Trustee’s position is that a self-employed Chapter 13 debtor, as in this case, should not be allowed to deduct the ordinary and necessary business expenses from line 3 of the SCMI when

calculating the current monthly income and the applicable commitment period, even though the official form (Form B22C) so provides. The Trustee contests deduction of ordinary and necessary business expenses when calculating Debtor’s current monthly income in Part I of Official Form B22C vis a vis allowing said deductions in “Other Expenses” category included in Part IV of Form B22 C. Form B22C comprises: (i) a report of current monthly income (Part I of Form B22C), (ii) calculation of the plan’s applicable commitment period (Part II of Form B22C) and (iii) computation of means test and deductions to determine monthly disposable income for above-median income chapter 13 debtors (Parts III & IV of Form B22C). We must first analyze the pertinent statutory language in Sections 101(10A) and 1325(b)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code. 11 U.S.C. §§ 101(10A) & 1325. Section 1325(a) sets forth the requirements for Chapter 13 plan confirmation. 11 U.S.C. § 1325. Additional requirements for confirmation are triggered by an objection from a trustee or an unsecured creditor, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(1). For instance, the Court is precluded from confirming a plan over the objection of a trustee or holder of an allowed unsecured claim unless: (A) the value of the property to be distributed under the plan on account of such claim is not less than the amount of such [unsecured] claim; or (B) the plan provides that all of the debtor’s projected disposable income to be received in the applicable commitment period beginning on the date that the first payment is due under the plan will be applied to make payments to unsecured creditors under the plan. Section 1325(b)(1) Debtor in this case is not proposing to pay unsecured creditors’ claims in full, therefore, he must commit all of his projected disposable income received during the applicable commitment

period to fund the plan. Section 1325(b) begins the disposable income calculation by determining the debtor’s current monthly income. Section 101(10A) defines “current monthly income” as the “average monthly income from all sources that the debtor receives, without regard to whether such income is taxable income, derived during the 6-month period before the petition date, subject to certain exclusions specified in Section 101(10A)(A)(i) & (ii). 11 U.S.C. § 101(10A). After obtaining its current monthly income, a debtor must then subtract a series of income exclusions and expense deductions to arrive at “disposable income”. In re Williams, 394 B.R. 550, 557 (Bankr.D.Colo. Sep 12, 2008) citing 6 Keith M. Lundin, Chapter 13 Bankruptcy § 467.1 at 467- 3 to 467-12 (3d ed.2000 & Supp.2007–1) (describing the categories of exclusions and adjustments a debtor must make to get from current monthly income to disposable income). In this regard, Section 1325(b)(2) defines “disposable income” as the current monthly income received by the debtor, less amounts reasonably necessary for support and maintenance of the debtor and the debtor’s dependents. 11 U.S.C.1325(b)(2)(A). Under Section 1325(b)(2)(B), debtors engaged in business are subject to additional exclusions and deductions to arrive at the disposable income. That is, after the deduction of amounts necessary for support and maintenance of the debtor and the debtor’s dependents, the debtor must also deduct from the business gross income those expenditures which are necessary for the continuation, preservation, and operation of the debtor’s business. 11 U.S.C. 1325(b)(2)(B); 8 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 1325.11[4][c] (16th ed.). In this sense, the Court’s task is limited to determining whether expenditures are necessary for the continuation, preservation, and operation of the business. 11 U.S.C. 1325(b)(2)(B); 8 Collier

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Juan Carlos Ocasio Roman, (prb 2011).

In re: Juan Carlos Ocasio Roman (In re: Juan Carlos Ocasio Roman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Nance
371 B.R. 358 (S.D. Illinois, 2007)
Drummond v. Wiegand (In Re Wiegand)
386 B.R. 238 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)
In Re Williams
394 B.R. 550 (D. Colorado, 2008)
In Re Arnold
376 B.R. 652 (M.D. Tennessee, 2007)
In Re Tuss
360 B.R. 684 (D. Montana, 2007)