Home/Ohio Supreme Court/In re J.T.

In re J.T.

2012 Ohio 2796, 132 Ohio St. 3d 298
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 26, 2012
Docket2011-1336
StatusPublished

This text of 2012 Ohio 2796 (In re J.T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re J.T., 2012 Ohio 2796, 132 Ohio St. 3d 298 (Ohio 2012).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents and would order briefing. *299 Kenneth Oswalt, Licking County Prosecuting Attorney, and Rachel Otkavec, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Todd W. Barstow, for appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re J.T.
2011 Ohio 3324 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2012 Ohio 2796, 132 Ohio St. 3d 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jt-ohio-2012.