In re J.T.

Ohio Supreme Court

In re J.T.

2012 Ohio 2796, 132 Ohio St. 3d 298

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 26, 2012·No. 2011-1336·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents and would order briefing. *299 Kenneth Oswalt, Licking County Prosecuting Attorney, and Rachel Otkavec, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Todd W. Barstow, for appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents and would order briefing. *299 Kenneth Oswalt, Licking County Prosecuting Attorney, and Rachel Otkavec, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Todd W. Barstow, for appellant.

In re J.T., 2012 Ohio 2796, 132 Ohio St. 3d 298 (Ohio 2012).

Pincite

2012 Ohio 2796 (In re J.T.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related