in Re J&R Schugel Trucking Inc., J&R Schugel Logistics Inc., J&R Schugel Holdings Inc., and Scott Briggs
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-21-00091-CV
IN RE J&R SCHUGEL TRUCKING INC., J&R Schugel Logistics Inc., J&R Schugel Holdings Inc., and Scott Briggs, Relators
Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 31, 2021
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
Relators have filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief. We
have the power to issue writs of mandamus when “agreeable to the principles of law regulating
those writs.” TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(b). For mandamus, a relator has the burden to file a
petition and record showing “the trial court abused its discretion and that no adequate appellate
remedy exists.” In re H.E.B. Grocery Co., L.P., 492 S.W.3d 300, 302 (Tex. 2016) (orig.
proceeding) (per curiam). Having reviewed the petition and documents included in the appendix,
we conclude relators have not satisfied their burden. Accordingly, we deny the petition and motion
for temporary relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 2
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018CI21379, styled Ismael Garcia v. J&R Schugel Trucking Inc., et al., pending in the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Nicole Garza presiding. 2 This court previously denied the petition and motion by an administrative order on March 18, 2021.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re J&R Schugel Trucking Inc., J&R Schugel Logistics Inc., J&R Schugel Holdings Inc., and Scott Briggs (in Re J&R Schugel Trucking Inc., J&R Schugel Logistics Inc., J&R Schugel Holdings Inc., and Scott Briggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.