in Re Joyce Reece and Zachary Pettit

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 2, 2021·No. 01-21-00014-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued March 2, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00014-CV ——————————— IN RE JOYCE REECE AND ZACHARY PETTIT, Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators, Joyce Reece and Zachary Pettit, have filed a petition for a writ of

mandamus asserting that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to rule on

relators’ plea to the jurisdiction and by granting the motion to disqualify relators’

counsel, Joseph R. Willie, II D.D.S., J.D. We deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.1 All pending motions are

dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goodman and Farris.

1 The underlying case is Clarence Roy as next friend of Clarice A. Thomas v. Zachary Pettit and Joyce Reece, Cause No. 2017-49867, in the 281st District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Christine Weems presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Joyce Reece and Zachary Pettit, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

in Re Joyce Reece and Zachary Pettit (in Re Joyce Reece and Zachary Pettit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.