In re Joyce A. R.

52 A.D.2d 882, 383 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12723
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 10, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 52 A.D.2d 882 (In re Joyce A. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Joyce A. R., 52 A.D.2d 882, 383 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12723 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 6 of the Family Court Act to permanently terminate parental custody by reason of permanent neglect, the petitioner, Catholic Guardian Society of the Diocese of Brooklyn, appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated July 30, 1975, which, after a hearing, inter alia, dismissed the petition. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, and petition granted. The record indicates that the petitioner did indeed make "diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship” (see Family Ct Act, § 614, subd 1, par [c]). Special arrangements for parental visiting were made and, by respondent’s own admission, concrete suggestions for support, so as to permit discharge of the child to the natural mother’s custody, were made on numerous occasions. While it is possible that the petitioner could have done more in order to satisfy the most searching mind, we must not become enmeshed in an analysis of the niceties of the precise degree of required diligence of effort, where to do so would jeopardize the welfare of the child (see Matter of Ray A. M., 48 AD2d 161, affd 37 NY2d 619). We find that petitioner met its burden of proof in all respects (see Family Ct Act, §§ 611,'614; Matter of Jones, 59 Misc 2d 69, 73; Matter of Stephen B., 60 Misc 2d 662, 668); accordingly, the petition should have been granted. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Jennie EE.
187 A.D.2d 877 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re the Commitment of Star A.
83 A.D.2d 529 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
In re Ann U.
75 A.D.2d 944 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
In re Sydel D. Edwin Gould Services for Children
58 A.D.2d 810 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 A.D.2d 882, 383 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-joyce-a-r-nyappdiv-1976.