In re Joyce A-M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Joyce A-M.

68 A.D.3d 417, 888 N.Y.2d 745

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 1, 2009

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 68 A.D.3d 417 (In re Joyce A-M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Joyce A-M., 68 A.D.3d 417, 888 N.Y.2d 745 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

The placement is moot as the date scheduled for the next per[418]*418manency hearing has passed (see Matter of Stephon Elijah G., 63 AD3d 640 [2009]). The finding of neglect is supported by a preponderance of the evidence showing that respondent failed to timely pick up the children from day care, necessitating police involvement to ensure their safety, and had been found guilty of neglect in prior, separate proceedings. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Sweeny, Catterson, Freedman and Roman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The placement is moot as the date scheduled for the next per[418]*418manency hearing has passed (see Matter of Stephon Elijah G., 63 AD3d 640 [2009]). The finding of neglect is supported by a preponderance of the evidence showing that respondent failed to timely pick up the children from day care, necessitating police involvement to ensure their safety, and had been found guilty of neglect in prior, separate proceedings. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Sweeny, Catterson, Freedman and Roman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 A.D.3d 417, 888 N.Y.2d 745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-joyce-a-m-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack