in Re Jovany Jamper Paredes

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 26, 2022
Docket14-22-00038-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Jovany Jamper Paredes (in Re Jovany Jamper Paredes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Jovany Jamper Paredes, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Order filed April 26, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00038-CR

IN RE JOVANY JAMPHER PAREDES, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 337th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1241896

ORDER

On January 24, 2022, relator Jovany Jampher Paredes filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Colleen Gaido, presiding judge of the 337th District Court of Harris County, to rule on two pending motions: (1) “Motion for Forensic DNA Testing Under Chapter 64 of the Code of Criminal Procedure”; and (2) “Motion to Appoint Counsil [sic] under Ch. 64.01 of the C.C.P.” Relator’s petition does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(j), (k); 52.7(a). Relator has not certified that he “has reviewed the petition and concluded that every factual statement in the petition is supported by competent evidence included in the appendix or record.” See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(j). Additionally, relator did not file an appendix that contains “certified or sworn copies of any . . . document showing the matter complained of.” Further, relator did not include with his petition a “certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding” and “a properly authenticated transcript of any relevant testimony from any underlying proceeding, including any exhibits offered in evidence, or a statement that no testimony was adduced in connection with the matter complained.” An unsworn declaration is an alternate method that relator may use for certification. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 132.001.

By this order, the Court gives relator notice that his petition for writ of mandamus will be dismissed unless relator supplements and/or amends his petition to addresses the issues identified above on or before May 26, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Spain, and Hassan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 132.001
Texas CP § 132.001

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Jovany Jamper Paredes, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jovany-jamper-paredes-texapp-2022.