In re Jovan W.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Jovan W.

92 A.D.3d 888, 939 N.Y.2d 863

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 21, 2012·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

[889] The mother’s appeal from so much of the order as denied her application for the return of the child Jovan W pending completion of the proceeding has been rendered academic by the Family Court’s completion of the proceeding and its concomitant fact-finding determination of neglect (see Matter of Charnel T., 49 AD3d 427 [2008]; Matter of Naila A., 39 AD3d 628, 629 [2007]; Matter of Eddie J., 273 AD2d 239 [2000]).

The mother’s remaining contention has also been rendered academic. Angiolillo, J.E, Dickerson, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Motion by the respondent on appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated September 3, 2010, to dismiss the appeal as academic. By decision and order of this Court dated August 9, 2011, the motion was held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the submission of the appeal, it is

Ordered that the motion is denied as academic in light of the determination of the appeal. Angiolillo, J.E, Dickerson, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[889] The mother’s appeal from so much of the order as denied her application for the return of the child Jovan W pending completion of the proceeding has been rendered academic by the Family Court’s completion of the proceeding and its concomitant fact-finding determination of neglect (see Matter of Charnel T., 49 AD3d 427 [2008]; Matter of Naila A., 39 AD3d 628, 629 [2007]; Matter of Eddie J., 273 AD2d 239 [2000]).

The mother’s remaining contention has also been rendered academic. Angiolillo, J.E, Dickerson, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Motion by the respondent on appeal from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated September 3, 2010, to dismiss the appeal as academic. By decision and order of this Court dated August 9, 2011, the motion was held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the submission of the appeal, it is

Ordered that the motion is denied as academic in light of the determination of the appeal. Angiolillo, J.E, Dickerson, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.

In re Jovan W., 92 A.D.3d 888, 939 N.Y.2d 863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

92 A.D.3d 888 (In re Jovan W.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related