Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Joshua E. S.-H.

In re Joshua E. S.-H.

97 A.D.3d 589, 947 N.Y.2d 327
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 5, 2012
StatusPublished

This text of 97 A.D.3d 589 (In re Joshua E. S.-H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Joshua E. S.-H., 97 A.D.3d 589, 947 N.Y.2d 327 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in terminating the mother’s parental rights, as a preponderance of the evidence adduced at the dispositional hearing established that it would be in the subject child’s best interests to be freed for adoption by his foster parent (see Matter of Jamel Raheem B. [Vernice B.], 89 AD3d 933, 935 [2011]; Matter of Andrea B., 66 AD3d 770, 771 [2009]; Matter of Chyanne H., 62 AD3d 876 [2009]; Matter of Tyria W., 41 AD3d 859, 860 [2007]; Matter of Olivia Susan C., 2 AD3d 441, 442 [2003]). Angiolillo, J.P., Belen, Chambers and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Olivia Susan C.
2 A.D.3d 441 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
In re Tyria W.
41 A.D.3d 859 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
In re Chyanne H.
62 A.D.3d 876 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
In re Andrea B.
66 A.D.3d 770 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
In re Jamel Raheem B.
89 A.D.3d 933 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 A.D.3d 589, 947 N.Y.2d 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-joshua-e-s-h-nyappdiv-2012.