In Re Joshua Crampton v. the State of Texas
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
NO. 09-26-00304-CV
IN RE JOSHUA CRAMPTON
Original Proceeding
457th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 26-04-06331
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Joshua Crampton filed a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to vacate an Order Granting Motion to Consolidate and to address Crampton’s Motion for Default Judgment in one of the cases. We notified Crampton of defects in the petition, and provided an extension of time until August 3, 2026, to provide Crampton with an opportunity to file a corrected petition. To date, we have not received a petition that corrects the defects noted in the clerk’s notice.
After having been provided with an opportunity to file a proper mandamus petition, Relator has not demonstrated his entitlement to mandamus relief.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus without prejudice. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on August 19, 2026 Opinion Delivered August 20, 2026
Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Joshua Crampton v. the State of Texas (In Re Joshua Crampton v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.