In Re Joshua Crampton v. the State of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)·Decided August 20, 2026·No. 09-26-00304-CV·Published

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

NO. 09-26-00304-CV

IN RE JOSHUA CRAMPTON

Original Proceeding

457th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 26-04-06331

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Joshua Crampton filed a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to vacate an Order Granting Motion to Consolidate and to address Crampton’s Motion for Default Judgment in one of the cases. We notified Crampton of defects in the petition, and provided an extension of time until August 3, 2026, to provide Crampton with an opportunity to file a corrected petition. To date, we have not received a petition that corrects the defects noted in the clerk’s notice.

After having been provided with an opportunity to file a proper mandamus petition, Relator has not demonstrated his entitlement to mandamus relief.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus without prejudice. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on August 19, 2026 Opinion Delivered August 20, 2026

Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Joshua Crampton v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

In Re Joshua Crampton v. the State of Texas (In Re Joshua Crampton v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.