In Re Joseph S. and Cherylann Insalaco v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 18, 2024.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-24-00758-CV
IN RE JOSEPH S. AND CHERYLANN INSALACO, Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
164th District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2022-04391
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On October 11, 2024, relators Joseph S. and Cherylann Insalaco filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable C. Elliott Thornton, presiding judge of the 164th District Court of Harris County, to enforce the parties’ alleged settlement agreement and to enter the parties alleged agreed orders.
Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief.
Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Joseph S. and Cherylann Insalaco v. the State of Texas (In Re Joseph S. and Cherylann Insalaco v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.