In Re Joseph S. and Cherylann Insalaco v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 18, 2024·No. 14-24-00758-CV·Published

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 18, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00758-CV

IN RE JOSEPH S. AND CHERYLANN INSALACO, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

164th District Court Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2022-04391

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 11, 2024, relators Joseph S. and Cherylann Insalaco filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable C. Elliott Thornton, presiding judge of the 164th District Court of Harris County, to enforce the parties’ alleged settlement agreement and to enter the parties alleged agreed orders.

Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief.

Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Joseph S. and Cherylann Insalaco v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

In Re Joseph S. and Cherylann Insalaco v. the State of Texas (In Re Joseph S. and Cherylann Insalaco v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.