In Re Joseph S. and Cherylann Insalaco v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Joseph S. and Cherylann Insalaco v. the State of Texas (In Re Joseph S. and Cherylann Insalaco v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 18, 2024.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-24-00758-CV
IN RE JOSEPH S. AND CHERYLANN INSALACO, Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 164th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2022-04391
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On October 11, 2024, relators Joseph S. and Cherylann Insalaco filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable C. Elliott Thornton, presiding judge of the 164th District Court of Harris County, to enforce the parties’ alleged settlement agreement and to enter the parties alleged agreed orders. Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Joseph S. and Cherylann Insalaco v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-joseph-s-and-cherylann-insalaco-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.