in Re Joseph P. Armstrong
This text of in Re Joseph P. Armstrong (in Re Joseph P. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 17, 2014
No. 04-14-00496-CV
IN RE Joseph P. ARMSTRONG
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
ORDER
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
On July 16, 2014, relator Joseph P. Armstrong filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for temporary relief. This court is of the opinion that a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real party in interest may file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus in this court no later than August 7, 2014. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.
Relator’s request for emergency relief is GRANTED. Further proceedings in the underlying suit, Cause No. 2011-CI-09126, styled Yolanda Castaneda v. Joseph P. Armstrong, are temporarily stayed pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus filed in this court.
It is so ORDERED on July 17th, 2014. PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO: _____________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011-CI-09126, styled Yolanda Castaneda v. Joseph P. Armstrong, pending in the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Antonia Arteaga presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Joseph P. Armstrong, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-joseph-p-armstrong-texapp-2014.