in Re: Joseph Hill Jordan
This text of in Re: Joseph Hill Jordan (in Re: Joseph Hill Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
NUMBER 13-05-409-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE: JOSEPH HILL JORDAN
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Yañez, Castillo, and Garza
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Relator Joseph Hill Jordan filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on June 29, 2005. On July 1, 2005, the Court requested a response from the real party in interest, Mollie Hildebrand.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the response, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought and that the requests should be denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 19th day of July 2005.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Joseph Hill Jordan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-joseph-hill-jordan-texapp-2005.