in Re: Joseph Hill Jordan

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 19, 2005
Docket13-05-00409-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Joseph Hill Jordan (in Re: Joseph Hill Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Joseph Hill Jordan, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

                             NUMBER 13-05-409-CV

                         COURT OF APPEALS

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE: JOSEPH HILL JORDAN

                      On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

                       Before Justices Yañez, Castillo, and Garza

                             Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Relator Joseph Hill Jordan  filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on June 29, 2005.  On July 1, 2005,  the Court requested a response from  the real party in interest, Mollie Hildebrand.


The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the response, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought and that the requests should be denied.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).  The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion  delivered and filed

this 19th day of July 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Joseph Hill Jordan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-joseph-hill-jordan-texapp-2005.