in Re: Joseph Cobb
This text of in Re: Joseph Cobb (in Re: Joseph Cobb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed July 21, 2005.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-05-00650-CV
IN RE JOSEPH COBB, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On July 1, 2005, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In his petition, relator sought to have this court compel the Harris County District Clerk to act on his motion to quash or, alternatively, for a speedy trial in his pending criminal cases.
We have jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus against a district court judge or county court judge in our district, and we may issue all writs necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. ' 22.221(a), ' 22.221(b) (Vernon 2004). We have no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk unless such is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex. App.CHouston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding). Relator does not have an appeal pending in this matter; thus, we have no jurisdiction to enforce.
Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed July 21, 2005.
Panel consists of Justices Yates, Anderson and Hudson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Joseph Cobb, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-joseph-cobb-texapp-2005.