in Re Joseph Barnard Hines

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 4, 2015
Docket01-15-00105-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Joseph Barnard Hines (in Re Joseph Barnard Hines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Joseph Barnard Hines, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

0 f- I S - CJO I () S"- C V FILED IN 0 I -- I s - oo I 0 6 - c v f~~URTQF APPEALS STON, TEXAS

JiJv~ltE Ci\SE NUMaERS: FEB- 4 2015 98-00746J : 98-00755J CHRISTOPHER A .. ·PRINE CLERK_ IN THE MATTER OF § IN THE 14th COURT OF APPEAL;;S::---~ JOSEPH ABRNARD H!l\JES, § CASE NO. ___~.,....,......-... RELATOR vs. § THE HONORABLE JUDGE DEVLIN GLENN, § RESPONDENT

AP?LI~TIQN FOR WRlT 0~ ~~S

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT: COMES NOW,JOSEPH BARNARD HINES,Relator,in oro se, in the above style and case numbers and files this application for writ of mandamus and will show- the court the followinq:

I. Relator is an offender incarcerated in the TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JU- STICE-ID AND CAN he located at 899 f.m. 632,Kenedv,Tx. 78119. Relator has exhausted his remedies and has no other adequate remedy at law.

II.

The Court of AoPeals has jurisdiction to consider and issue order of writ of mandamus. PADILLA v. McDANIEL,l22 S.W. 3d 805(TEX.CRIM.APP~2003}. An a district court may be compelled via mandamus to consider and ru,le on a oendinq motion presented to the court.see,STATE exrel.CURRY v. GRAY,726 s.w. 2d 12:5,128 (TEX.CRIM.APP.l987}. III. The act souqht to comoelled is m.iniste_rial, not discret:ionarv in natur.e. Re- lator has orooerly filed a motion with the 313th district court,sittinq as a juvenile court, ~equestinq for an order to be ~ssued ~or ~nsoection and/or purchase a copy of certification records. Relator motion was filed on 12-J,6-14.see,E~-A fmotion to insoect,retain,and/ or purchase J • Relator the filed a letter with the 313th district court request• inq for a ruling on his motion on 1-lS~lS.see,EX-13 fletter requesting a ruling on motionl. But Resoondent has abused his discretion where he refuses to con- sider anq ru,J,e on Rel~tor's motion.

3 ResP<)hdent has a ininiste_rial duty.to rul~ on R~lator's motion that has been I

properly filed before the court.see,WHITE v. REITER,640 s.w. 2d 586,594fTEX. CRIM.APP. 19821. Fundamental requirements of due process mandates an OO)POrtunity to be heard. CREEL v. DISTRICT ATTY. FoR MeDINA C00NTY,818 S.W. ~d 45,46 f'I'EX.199],1: In Re- CHRISTENSEN,39 S.W. 3d 250fTEX.APP.-AMARILLO 20001. From Relator's motion and letter,its clear that he has reoeatly put Resoonden4 on notice that Relator seeks an order to be issued to inspect/or purchase a certified copy of certification records,and such records are required to oro- ceed in in appealinq the order of transfer. Relator has gone well beYond any requj,re_ments or obligations imposed upon hilll by law. Relator has no,;other~;a:dequate remedy by l:aw to .inspect/or purchase a copy of said records. In contrast to Relator's efforts Respandent has whooly failed to comply with TEX, FAM. CODE ANN.§ 58.003fh1,and to adhere to a ministerial duty.

PRAYER OF RELIEF WHEREFORE, Relator resoectfully request an order to be issued granting his writ of mandamus orderinq Respondent to rule on Relator's motion within a re- asonable time frame provided by this Court of Aooeals. JUVENILE CASE NUMBERS: 98-00746J: 98-00755J

IN THE MATTER OF § IN THE 14th COUR!I' OF APPEALS JOSEPH BARNARD HINES, § RELATOR § CASE NO. v. ~

THE HONORABLE JUDGE DEVLIN GLENN, § RESPONDENT

PROPOSE ORDER

Ol:l this d,ay,came to be heard the foregoing Relator's motion for leave to issue writ of mandamus and application for writ of mandarnus,and it appears to the court that the same should be:

GRANTED / DE;NIED

It's further ORDERED,that the ResPOndent has days to rule on Relator's motion. day of Signed on this - - -,20

PRESIDING JUDGE JUVENILE CASE NUMBERS: 98-00746J: 98~00755J

AFFIDAVIT

I, JpSEPH BARNARD HINES,#901768,swear undE!r the oenaltv of perjury that the facts and allegations in the application for writ of mandamus and motion for lea?e are true ·and correct.

signed on 1-31-15. X

uNSWORN DECLARATION

!,JOSEPH B. HINES,#901768,being presentlv·inca:tcerated in the TEX. DEPT. OF CRIM. JUST.-ID,qeclare ,under penalty of perjury that I am the affivant in this affidavit and the facts and allegations are true and correct.

executed on 1-31-lS. ·--,....,-,- -·-~- - -- ... ' .- ·-

',: .,'' !·;. f:l '- ){3. .-~·"

t~I"}C',)'. ' Vq ~I rih!J'fitJ v ,, 4· Q h &Q f)' f 7 !j: t J'r;) •, '1 3} '11" /V1 J /Of i ,;;j f v~"'tJ-J (. flJI.r}~~~J, 'af . ·tro.l S!Yt ·1() u6~ nr~ 7\(f .&r ' r· ?nsfl ·. i y .:or . :/~rJc] . i.; 7 . ' .· . .. ,~ . .Jry.;:: ~:~~v/f:>·imb·ij r:; ~ .. ! fV?f' (j JIV "~. ~~ • i't'"' ': • • • • \ I'

~~~ ·-·•··•·'" •, I. ~- .\.

'·,~ ' Cllint:7 (.,~ 11: _jO: ~J fJ 71¥t pi hm~Cf1J r?-t 'JM~(, . -:1 e.::'lf,~Y~:J:J,J :~f :.~l!j f.JrJ~~ tJ'-'f;;p '-ffOJH ~'{t VI . f~iltJ! II _;Vc;? Y7~ .. -~f<::7!1·(1/;y ·.. ;,~5//15' f:·;Uvf1·· 7Jf'V }~'?J. .."7'1);;. ·

"'f • f71jfiijW'lJf f7VFl fli'}'f(~l r;:?Jll-.fY'lM)11 i . ' ·-:t .'

: fit;', ro!f <'j 3 "{t . f/)1('/ ) i~r ('1:Jt.I/OJ I .. .' . 1

.... / ·;,kJJ~ 9'}\. QJ;V'S JO · :l~CJVU:. :?1'1)\o:fY;:;J7:j)y).;}. AJf! J .-~j~J.:'i1d Jrl -•·•',1'";--' (~····., .... ,',<<------·~v." -~:-~.~;, ... ~ ___ , ·~··-•··- •"''/:~"- ·•···-·· "'- .-.,.~ .... ··~-• .. · ..--~· -·· •.• .• •·'-•"" ·- . ... · . r ' . ······- • ··- ·- "

. 'J5,WHu1JI1J 21''fOIVf? '(V:r::vJ-?JZf, t .W)d'SO'J! QJ,.. ~rtJiv .. ; ..... . . '. ~- .. ....

5~)<4" '.A~dJ S:tJYI:lH jG (,.J-U11~J ~ * J..CVt:Jf\0 W

'">!"";t;H 01l1~V\1ca MJ '1-S'r.! f . t-J:cytszq 3)-xv1ftf?r H..Ltr£ · .3HJ:. (\':::1:·· •. ~ .p Ji1J..fJ Tl 3HJ- n:t

·"t5Sl.""ro:a[ r167J:ia:xrz; ·Qnl !S-~~~"ll ' ,, .,, ,·~

. f;(.- Jf3.· . . ·-~

~ . ;

. /· ~ ~ '' --~ ~· ·-

'+"' .

· "&'>17\f~..Jvrd JO ... vorf?,pJS V! --!'lj /1fUri ':"!?_ ~ ~ !.'_S( V 0 OQ !f~' W S :'f <; fVIJJ6

'".:',·', · t. '·...~ ""'rJ ··•··· .' ... ~ irt ~t'! . J. fl if;' "Yt?~i$11) ~, t<-~ ~ (1(1 w I ~ ~~ 3/J ~ f"' ~\

'' . tj'i:-?dtJ. .· '>·ttft · y.f! M . ~f '}• (Jq . s f?J<:> J 6 J . -~·'-ft.,,. ·c~f •' 'n'ci!~~ ·. ,·1/ff' i vvlt' 1'1 ·a.~vcl,~..~d c;n r<;i o.f err~ 1 u 11 . . f~ Fir 1 ),~idrJd -~,t~;~q-twj · V?' · ~'t;n "-1· bU!f7!7':;i . )) ~ '"f ;.:!~If~' . t:~t"~7'fu :.i 1 '>f--! <'J 0 I '~ff ..JC') r-i~~~ lj \; "lf tV .:i(IQ yy -/ Jrlr~#

~ . ) \7) 0 7 i7 J \ /CI f><7 d .,;~ :J ~~ )-n.Qij ~' )111 C'i) · C1'1J- c·:. • .· . . . .. , \b . · • '>

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Joseph Barnard Hines, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-joseph-barnard-hines-texapp-2015.