In re Jose R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Jose R.

47 A.D.2d 925, 369 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9371

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 21, 1975·Published

Opinion

In proceedings pursuant to article 7 of the Family Court Act, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 13, 1974, which, upon two determinations that appellant was a juvenile delinquent, placed him on probation. Appellant has brought up for review only one of said determinations, that under the petition in Docket No. D 2622/74. Order reversed, on the facts, said petition dismissed and proceeding remanded to the Family Court for the making of a new order of disposition with regard to the other determination, that under Docket No. 17206/73. The allegations of the petition under Docket No. D 2622/74 were not proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Furthermore, the evidence did not support a finding that, beyond a reasonable doubt, there had been an attempt at coercion. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Martuscello, Cohalan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In proceedings pursuant to article 7 of the Family Court Act, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated March 13, 1974, which, upon two determinations that appellant was a juvenile delinquent, placed him on probation. Appellant has brought up for review only one of said determinations, that under the petition in Docket No. D 2622/74. Order reversed, on the facts, said petition dismissed and proceeding remanded to the Family Court for the making of a new order of disposition with regard to the other determination, that under Docket No. 17206/73. The allegations of the petition under Docket No. D 2622/74 were not proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Furthermore, the evidence did not support a finding that, beyond a reasonable doubt, there had been an attempt at coercion. Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Martuscello, Cohalan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

In re Jose R., 47 A.D.2d 925, 369 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9371 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

47 A.D.2d 925 (In re Jose R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.