in Re Jose Medina
This text of in Re Jose Medina (in Re Jose Medina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 30, 2019
No. 04-19-00041-CR
IN RE Jose MEDINA
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
ORDER
On January 21, 2019, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for leave to file his petition. After considering the petition, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). We DENY as moot relator’s motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus because a motion for leave is not required for a petition filed in an intermediate appellate court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1.
It is so ORDERED on January 30, 2019.
_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 30th day of January, 2019.
_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010-CR-1086-W1, styled The State of Texas v. Jose Medina, pending in the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Sid L. Harle presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Jose Medina, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jose-medina-texapp-2019.