In Re Jose M. Portalatin and Lewis Brooks McKenzie, PhD v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 1, 2025·No. 02-25-00309-CV·Published

Opinion

In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

No. 02-25-00309-CV

IN RE JOSE M. PORTALATIN AND LEWIS BROOKS MCKENZIE, PHD, Relators

Original Proceeding Tarrant County, Texas

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Birdwell and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relators’ Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus

and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relators’ petition is

denied. 1

Per Curiam

Delivered: July 1, 2025

Relators’ Motion for Leave to File Emergency Writs of Mandamus and 1

Prohibition is denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Jose M. Portalatin and Lewis Brooks McKenzie, PhD v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

In Re Jose M. Portalatin and Lewis Brooks McKenzie, PhD v. the State of Texas (In Re Jose M. Portalatin and Lewis Brooks McKenzie, PhD v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.