In Re Jose M. Portalatin and Lewis Brooks McKenzie, PhD v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Jose M. Portalatin and Lewis Brooks McKenzie, PhD v. the State of Texas (In Re Jose M. Portalatin and Lewis Brooks McKenzie, PhD v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-25-00309-CV ___________________________
IN RE JOSE M. PORTALATIN AND LEWIS BROOKS MCKENZIE, PHD, Relators
Original Proceeding Tarrant County, Texas
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Birdwell and Wallach, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION
The court has considered relators’ Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus
and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relators’ petition is
denied. 1
Per Curiam
Delivered: July 1, 2025
Relators’ Motion for Leave to File Emergency Writs of Mandamus and 1
Prohibition is denied as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Jose M. Portalatin and Lewis Brooks McKenzie, PhD v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jose-m-portalatin-and-lewis-brooks-mckenzie-phd-v-the-state-of-texapp-2025.