in Re Jose "Joe" Hinojosa
This text of in Re Jose "Joe" Hinojosa (in Re Jose "Joe" Hinojosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 17, 2015
No. 04-15-00442-CV
IN RE Jose "Joe" HINOJOSA
Original Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice
On July 17, 2015, relator Jose “Joe” Hinojosa filed a petition for writs of mandamus and prohibition and a motion for emergency relief. The court has considered the petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief are DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on July 17, 2015.
_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 17th day of July, 2015.
___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014-CVZ-000338 D3, styled Jose "Joe" Hinojosa v. Firefighters and Police Officers' Civil Service Commission of the City of Laredo, Texas; Irma Mireles, Vidal Cantu Jr., Jesus Torres and Luis Dovalina, Individually, pending in the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Jose "Joe" Hinojosa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jose-joe-hinojosa-texapp-2015.