in Re: Jose B. De LaCerda
This text of in Re: Jose B. De LaCerda (in Re: Jose B. De LaCerda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 12-08-00082-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
§
IN RE: JOSE B. DE LA CERDA,
RELATOR § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Jose B. De La Cerda filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking an order requiring the trial court to rule on his motion for restitution, which he alleges was filed on August 10, 2007.1 On behalf of the respondent, the Attorney General of Texas has filed a motion to dismiss this proceeding as moot and a motion to supplement its motion to dismiss with a copy of an order signed by the respondent on April 22, 2008 granting relief on De La Cerda’s motion. We agree that the order renders this proceeding moot. Accordingly, the motion to supplement the motion to dismiss is granted, and De La Cerda’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot.
SAM GRIFFITH
Justice
Opinion delivered April 30, 2008.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
(PUBLISH)
1 The respondent is the Honorable Deborah Oakes Evans, Judge of the 87th Judicial District Court of Anderson County, Texas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Jose B. De LaCerda, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jose-b-de-lacerda-texapp-2008.