in Re Jorge Hermida-Lara
Opinion
Opinion issued October 15, 2013
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00646-CV ——————————— IN RE JORGE HERMIDA-LARA, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On July 29, 2013, the relator, Jorge Hermida-Lara, filed a petition for writ of
mandamus, seeking relief from the trial court’s denial of relator’s motion to
disqualify opposing counsel.1
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.2
1 The underlying case is Rosa Rosas v. Jorge Hermida-Lara, No. 2012-69210, in the 308th District Court of Harris County Texas, the Honorable James Lombardino presiding. PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Massengale.
2 Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is procedurally defective. See TEX. R. APP. 9.5 (requiring that certificate of service contain date, manner of service, name and address of each person served, and, if person served is party’s attorney, name of party represented by that attorney); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(g) (requiring that every statement of fact in petition be supported by citation to competent evidence included in appendix or record); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(h) (requiring that petition include appropriate citations to authorities and to appendix or record materials); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k) (requiring that petition include appendix containing certified or sworn copy of any order complained of); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7 (requiring relator to file record with petition containing certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to relator’s claim and properly authenticated transcript of any relevant testimony from underlying proceeding). 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Jorge Hermida-Lara (in Re Jorge Hermida-Lara) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.