in Re: Jorge Barroquin

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 30, 2014·No. 05-14-00764-CV·Published

Opinion

Deny and Opinion Filed this 30th day of June, 2014.

S In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00764-CV

IN RE JORGE BARROQUIN, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 292nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1353472

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices O'Neill, Lang, and Brown Opinion by Justice Lang

Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial court to

grant relator a personal recognizance bond or reduce bail in response to his petition for pre- trial writ of habeas corpus. The facts and issues are well known to the parties so we do not recount them here. This Court has not been given general supervisory control over district and county courts. Texas Emp. Ins. Ass'n v. Kirby, 150 S.W.2d 123, 126 (Tex. Civ. App.— Dallas 1941, no writ); see also Guillory v. Davis, 527 S.W.2d 465, 466 (Tex. Civ. App.— Beaumont 1975, no writ). In a criminal case, an applicant for mandamus relief must establish that he has no adequate remedy at law to redress the harm he has suffered, and he must show that the act he seeks to compel or prohibit does not involve a discretionary or judicial decision. Simon v. Levario, 306 S.W.3d 318, 320 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009). The record before the Court does not show that relator has met this burden. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

Accordingly, the Court DENIES the petition for writ of mandamus.

/Douglas S. Lang/

DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE

140764F.P05

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Jorge Barroquin, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

in Re: Jorge Barroquin (in Re: Jorge Barroquin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simon v. Levario
306 S.W.3d 318 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2009)
Guillory v. Davis
527 S.W.2d 465 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1975)
Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Kirby
150 S.W.2d 123 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1941)