In re Jordan
This text of 673 N.E.2d 471 (In re Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER ACCEPTING RESIGNATION AND CONCLUDING PROCEEDING
On July 19, 1996, the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission filed a Third Amended Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action in this case. The respondent, Kim D. Jordan, has now filed his Affidavit of Resignation, pursuant to Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 28, Section 17(a).
And this Court, being duly advised, now finds that the respondent’s affidavit meets the necessary elements of Ind. Admission and Discipline Rule 23(17), that the resignation should be accepted and that, accordingly, all other proceedings pending in this case should be concluded.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the resignation of Kim D. Jordan is accepted. [472]*472Accordingly, he is hereby removed as a member of the bar of this state, effective November 23, 1992. The Clerk of this Court is directed to strike his name from the Roll of Attorneys, effective November 23,1992. The respondent must comply with the provisions of Admis.Disc.R. 23(4) in order to become eligible for reinstatement.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by reason of this Order accepting the respondent’s resignation, all issues not previously adjudicated in this proceeding are now concluded.
The Clerk of this Court is directed to forward notice of this Order in accordance with Admis.Disc.R. 23(3)(d), governing disbarment and suspension.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
673 N.E.2d 471, 1996 Ind. LEXIS 157, 1996 WL 679414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jordan-ind-1996.