In re Jordan G.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Jordan G.

235 A.D.2d 290, 653 N.Y.S.2d 301, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 469

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 21, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 235 A.D.2d 290 (In re Jordan G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jordan G., 235 A.D.2d 290, 653 N.Y.S.2d 301, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 469 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Leah Marks, J.), entered on or about October 25, 1995, which adjudicated respondent a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that respondent committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree, and placed him on probation for 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent’s guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Respondent came "dangerously near” the completion of the [291]*291crime when he approached the complainant and from a distance of about a foot and a half away, made repeated demands for his wallet, including a threat to "make trouble” if the complainant failed to comply (see, People v Acosta, 80 NY2d 665, 670). Concur—Wallach, J. P., Nardelli, Tom, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Leah Marks, J.), entered on or about October 25, 1995, which adjudicated respondent a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that respondent committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree, and placed him on probation for 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent’s guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Respondent came "dangerously near” the completion of the [291]*291crime when he approached the complainant and from a distance of about a foot and a half away, made repeated demands for his wallet, including a threat to "make trouble” if the complainant failed to comply (see, People v Acosta, 80 NY2d 665, 670). Concur—Wallach, J. P., Nardelli, Tom, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D.2d 290, 653 N.Y.S.2d 301, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jordan-g-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack