in Re: Jordan Blake

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 13, 2004
Docket13-04-00450-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Jordan Blake (in Re: Jordan Blake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Jordan Blake, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion




NUMBER 13-04-450-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

IN RE JORDAN BLAKE

__________________________________________________________________


On Petition for Writ of Mandamus ___________________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Wittig

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion


         Relator, Jordan Blake , filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on August 30, 2004. Gaylen M. Nuckols, real party in interest, filed a response thereto on September 29, 2004. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and response, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

                                                                                          PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this 13th day of October, 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Jordan Blake, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jordan-blake-texapp-2004.