in Re: Jordan Blake
This text of in Re: Jordan Blake (in Re: Jordan Blake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-04-450-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
___________________________________________________________________
IN RE JORDAN BLAKE
__________________________________________________________________
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus ___________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Wittig
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
Relator, Jordan Blake , filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on August 30, 2004. Gaylen M. Nuckols, real party in interest, filed a response thereto on September 29, 2004. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and response, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 13th day of October, 2004.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Jordan Blake, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jordan-blake-texapp-2004.