In re Jones

Supreme Court

In re Jones

134 S. Ct. 1958, 188 L. Ed. 2d 977, 572 U.S. 1086, 82 U.S.L.W. 3631, 2014 WL 1342962, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 3054

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 28, 2014·No. No. 13–9543.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) ( per curiam ).

*1959Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) ( per curiam ).

*1959Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.

In re Jones, 134 S. Ct. 1958, 188 L. Ed. 2d 977, 572 U.S. 1086, 82 U.S.L.W. 3631, 2014 WL 1342962, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 3054 (U.S. 2014).

Pincite

134 S. Ct. 1958 (In re Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related