In re Jones

720 A.2d 693
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 13, 1998
DocketNo. 456 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 720 A.2d 693 (In re Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Jones, 720 A.2d 693 (Pa. 1998).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 13th day of November, 1998, Bettyjo Theresa Jones, a/k/a Betty Jones-Terrell, having been suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of sixty days by Order of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals dated May 28, 1998; the said Bettyjo Theresa Jones, a/k/a Betty Jones-Terrell, having been directed on September 11, 1998, to inform this Court of any claim she has that the imposition of the identical or comparable discipline in this Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons therefor; and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Bettyjo Theresa Jones, a/k/a Betty Jones-Terrell, is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of sixty days, and she shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
720 A.2d 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jones-pa-1998.